ARCEN Sandbox

ARCEN-WorkSpace

Law firm matter workspaceSample data - no real client data requiredMatter setup - source readiness - chronology - professional review handoff
Sample matter 1 sample-data workflowProfessional review Required before authorised useFinal packet Locked
Sample data Professional Review Required Final Packet Locked

Law firm matter workspace

Rivermark Builders Pty Ltd v Northshore Fitout Group Pty Ltd

What this sandbox shows: Matter setup, source readiness, missing information, chronology preparation, and the professional review handoff in one product workflow.

Reason: Signed variation approval dated 14 March 2026 is still missing and one site meeting date still needs confirmation.

Next required action: Add the signed variation approval or record why it is unavailable before lawyer review.

Professional review: Professional review required.

Audit/governance: User and matter actions must be auditable.

Sandbox boundary: No real client data is required for this sample matter.

Open Professional Review Back to ARCEN Sandbox Request Pilot Access Contact ARCEN
Final packet Locked authorised lawyer/principal final output control

Host Account / Firm Overview

Firm controlled workspace
TenantUser modelFirm controlsAssigned mattersWorkflow authorityFinal Authority
Law Firm Host AccountSub AccountPermissions, audit logs, security, export controls1 active matter workflowControlled by assigned firm permissionsOnly authorised lawyer/principal roles

Sub-account Roles and Access

Permission-limited
RolesAccess ruleMatter accessAudit requirement
Host Admin, Principal Lawyer, Lawyer, Legal Operator, Reviewer, Billing Admin, Read-Only AuditorSub-accounts only access assigned permissionsAssignment requiredUser and matter actions must be auditable

P1 Intake

Practice-neutral
Matter ReferenceMatter TypePractice AreaParty PerspectiveJurisdiction / PathwayCurrent StagePrepared StatusFinal Authority
ARCEN-SBX-042Construction payment disputeCommercial / constructionRespondent companyNSW Supreme Court pathwayP2Sample dataOnly authorised lawyer/principal roles

Sample data only. No real client data is required for this workspace sandbox.

P3 Missing Material / Readiness

Readiness blocker

Deadline risk: the sample matter should not progress to professional review until the missing source and chronology point are addressed.

Current blocker: Signed variation approval dated 14 March 2026 is not yet on file.

Secondary blocker: One site meeting date still needs confirmation.

Add the signed variation approval or record why it is unavailable before lawyer review.

P2 Evidence / Source Trace

Source-bound
Source / Evidence ItemStatusTraceability UseMissing / PresentRequired Action
Executed subcontract and invoice schedule Verified Matter summary and chronology Present Ready for lawyer review
Signed variation approval dated 14 March 2026 Missing Missing information registry Missing Request source or record unavailability
Site meeting minutes Needs confirmation Chronology preparation Present Confirm the meeting date and attendee note
Uploaded document bundlePreparedReadiness input onlyPresentUploaded document does not equal final evidence

Source/evidence readiness remains subject to professional review.

Missing Information Registry

MRR
Missing ItemCategoryMaterialityReason MissingEscalationClosure Criteria
Signed variation approval dated 14 March 2026Source recordHighNot yet supplied for the sample matterProfessional review requiredSigned source or reason for unavailability
One site meeting date still needs confirmationChronologyMediumNeeds confirmationProfessional review where applicableDate confirmed or marked approximate

Gap Question

One question at a time

Current gap-driven question: Can signed variation approval dated 14 march 2026 be added, or should the record explain why it is unavailable?

Reason question is required: source readiness is blocked by a missing source and one chronology point still needs confirmation.

Professional review flag: Professional review required.

P4 Chronology

Source-bound chronology
Traceability StatusChronology FoundationFinal ChronologyNotes
Trace IDs presentStarted from contract, variation, meeting, and invoice eventsNot finalSource-bound chronology only

P5 Lawyer Review

Final authority visible

Professional Review Handoff: Assigned matter context remains source-bound until lawyer review.

Review StateSource StatusMissing InformationReview NotesFinal Output StatusFinal Authority
Requires reviewSource-boundOpenExplainedLockedOnly authorised lawyer/principal roles

P6 Final Gate

Final packet locked

Blocking reason: Professional review not completed.

Final authority: Only authorised lawyer/principal roles can approve final output.

Workflow authority: Stage changes remain controlled by assigned firm permissions and final review checks.

Final packet locked. authorised lawyer/principal final output control applies.

P7 Output / Export

Permission-controlled export

Export rule: Final output requires authorised lawyer/principal approval and host-account permission controls.

Final output remains locked until the workflow authority and final authority check allow export.

Boundary Notice

Not legal advice

ARCEN does not provide legal advice, legal representation, legal strategy, legal conclusions, outcome predictions, advocacy, regulator advocacy, or guaranteed outcomes. ARCEN does not automatically generate final legal documents. This workspace is draft, preparatory, source-bound, and subject to professional review. Final use is controlled by authorised lawyer/principal roles. No real client data is required for this sandbox. User and matter actions must be auditable. Confidence/readiness language is not a legal merits assessment.